These are six representative engagements grouped by service line. Client names and identifying details are anonymised — operators in this industry value discretion, and a Tier-1 brand publicly disclosing its software vendor is rare. The technical specifics, architecture choices, and outcome metrics are real.
Casino app development case studies
Greenfield casino platforms and replatform projects. Includes a Curaçao-licensed operator we took from architecture to first deposit in 14 weeks, and an MGA brand whose wallet system we rebuilt to handle five times the prior peak concurrency without changing player-facing UX.
Slot game development case studies
Original slot game builds with full RNG and math certification. Includes a six-game series for a studio targeting regulated European markets, and a single high-volatility title we tuned and re-certified after a maths review found the original RTP drifted under specific bonus-buy conditions.
Sports exchange development case studies
Peer-to-peer betting engines and hybrid exchange-sportsbook builds. Includes a cricket-focused exchange handling tens of thousands of in-play matches per second during major tournaments, and a smaller niche-sport exchange where the matching engine was the entire product.
iGaming MVP launches
Funded startup engagements from licence application to first real-money play. Includes a 90-day MVP for a seed-stage operator, and a 120-day build for a team that started with a wallet rebuild before deciding to greenfield the rest.
Enterprise iGaming platforms
Multi-brand backends serving tens of skins from a shared platform. Includes a group operator running fifteen casino brands and four sportsbook brands off one core, with brand-level isolation of bonus rules, payment configuration, and reporting.
Crypto casino platforms
Token-native operators with multi-chain wallets and provably-fair mechanics. Includes a USDT-and-BTC casino built on a custodial-non-custodial hybrid model, and a smaller provably-fair-only product where every game outcome is independently verifiable on-chain.
Reading order
If you are scoping similar work, the directly-matching case study is the right starting point. If you want a sense of how we work generally, the MVP launches page is the most representative. To discuss any of these in detail under NDA, contact us.
How to read these case studies
Each of the six studies follows the same structure — client snapshot, the challenge, the approach, tech stack, outcomes, and the services used — so you can compare engagements on the dimensions that matter to your own build. The details that identify a client are anonymised, because operators in this industry value discretion and a Tier-1 brand publicly naming its software vendor is rare. What is not anonymised is the substance: the architecture decisions, the sequencing, the technology choices and the outcome metrics are the real ones. Where a number depends on scope or jurisdiction, we say so rather than presenting it as a universal promise.
The thread running through all six
Read together, the studies make one argument repeatedly: the decisions that determine whether an iGaming build succeeds are made early and are mostly about ownership boundaries and sequencing, not about any single clever piece of code. The MVP build drew an ownership line and refused to let the rented side grow. The enterprise replatform migrated in fragility order and deferred the visible work until the backend was stable. The exchange proved its matching engine against historical replay before it touched money. The crypto casino built dormant compliance scaffolding so activation was a config change. Different verticals, same discipline — build for the audit first, scope honestly, and own what matters.
Which study fits your situation
If you are scoping work that directly matches one of the six — a casino app, a slot suite, an exchange, an MVP, an enterprise consolidation, a crypto platform — the matching study is your starting point. If you want a general sense of how we work, the MVP launches study is the most representative of a full end-to-end engagement under real constraints. If you are on the investor or enterprise side evaluating a target or a rebuild, the enterprise replatforming study shows how we think about inherited stacks. To discuss any of these in detail, including the full anonymised write-ups, we cover the specifics under NDA.